Analysis From W.S. free essay sample

Analysis of the text W. S. The text under analysis is an extract from a short story W. S. by Leslie Poles Hartley, a well-known British novelist and short story writer best-known for his novels which include Eustace and Hilda trilogy (1947) and The Go-Between (1953). The story W. S. comes from The complete short stories of L. P. Hartley published posthumously in 1973. The story W. S. is about a novelist Walter Streeter who one day gets a postcard from Forfar signed W. S. He doesnt pay any attention to this as he is used to get letters and he tears it. Later he gets 2 more postcards from Berwick-on- Tweed and York Minster. Getting them Walter Streeter becomes interested in the author. He notices that the author has the same initials as he has and that makes him think about him more. His friend supposes W. S. to be a woman who has taken a fancy to Walter Streeter. We will write a custom essay sample on Analysis From W.S. or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page When he gets the 4th postcard he becomes afraid as it was from Coventry and W. S. writes about his coming nearer. That makes Walter Streeter go to the police but they think it to be a hoax and advise him to come if he get some postcards more. The main character of the story is Walter Streeter. His character is round and dynamic. He is not stable throughout the extract. In the beginning of the story his attitude to the postcards is quite indifferent, but later when the postcards acquire more perilous nature, Walter Streeter feels less confidence and he is even a bit threatened. The author uses indirect method of characterization; L. P. Hartley Just gives clues about what kind of person Walter Streeter is through his words, actions and reaction of the other characters to him, in particular his friends attitude, who is ifficult to be called a friend, and the polices attitude to him. The author perfectly shows his personality through his thoughts: Walter Streeter compares himself with many famous people even if he is unknown beginner writer. Walter Streeter is a very inattentive person as he doesnt even notice that the W/ S/ has the same initials as he does. Another main character of the story is W. S. the author doesnt give us too many details about him or her. He Just gives clues that this kind of person doesnt really admire Walter Streeter as a brilliant writer. We could only Judge of his personality through the postcards, through the vocabulary he uses. The minor character of the story is Walter Streeters friend. It is difficult to name him a friend as he doesnt even behave in such a way. When Walter Streeter comes to ask for a piece of advice he suggests such a silly and feeble hypothesis that t creates the feeling that he said this just to make Walter Streeter go away and not bother him with his questions. His role in Walter Streeters life is not important, Walter Streeter may be wants to think him to e his friend but actually he understands that it is not possible. That is why I think he doesnt even have a name or any direct or even indirect description as describing his character is real spending of time. The author uses the third-person narrator, which means that the narrator doesnt participate in the story, he is a reporter of actions and speeches. But the distinctive feature of this story is that even if the author is not a participant of the actions we feel his presence in Walter Streeter s character, it means that the author can insert his mind. The story belongs to postmodernism iterary trend but it also has some elements of different styles, for example an such real people as Gilbert, Maugham, Shakespeare. The story is written in simple language. The author uses common literary words so the text is easy to read. The tone of the author throughout the extract is ironic and sarcastic. While telling us about the postcards the author uses an epithet firm handshake which in real life it turns out to be not very firm. He also uses many stylistic devices in order to make the reader understand what kind of person Walter Streeter is. He writes that after getting nother postcard a wave of panic surged up in Walter Streeter. This device again proves him to be diffidence. In order to create the atmosphere that the narrator and Walter Streeter is the same person the narrator uses such stylistic device as Perhaps I was getting into groove. This creates the understanding of the narrator and Walter Streeter to be closer than we could imagine. As we see the language of the writer is very rich and full of various kinds of stylistic devices and that makes his story more vivid and picturesque.

Obama Care Essays

Obama Care Essays Obama Care Essay Obama Care Essay Name Course Instructor Date Obama Care On March 23 2010, President Barrack Obama signed into law the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. The law and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act are a representation of the most important regulatory overhaul in the USA healthcare system. This has occurred since the passage of the 1965 Medicaid and Medicare acts. Enactment of the law has already begun and is set to continue in the process of restructuring the healthcare system. This law, endorsed by president Obama elicited different reactions and controversies. Some people support the law. However, others have opposed the law stating it is not going to be beneficial. President Obama has taken a strong stand stating that contrary to this Americans will gain. Consequently, many protagonists and antagonists constantly refer to the law as Obama Care. Currently, the law is popularly known as Obama Care. However, Obama care is a double-edged sword for the American healthcare system. The debate on Obamacare has been a staged in many areas among citizens, professional in the field of health, among politicians and government executives. This debate led the bill through a court process that made the Supreme Court rule in favor of the bill (Crowley). Americans are experiencing one of the most crucial financial crises of all time. Some of the problems among many critics of the law are that it might be expensive for the individual American and the federal government. The long-term implications of the bill are under scrutiny. Speculations abound that the bill may increase budget deficits. The goal of ObamaCare is to provide efficient and affordable healthcare insurance for all United States of America citizens. It also aims at reducing the increased levels of health care spending. Health care spending has been rising in America since 1980 when the expenditure was $256 billion. In 2010, the expenditure reached a whooping $2.6 trillion. This growth rate is projected to develop faster than national income in the near future. Recession in recent years has fostered lower incomes and higher unemployment rates. Most individuals and families therefore find healthcare more of a luxury than a necessity. Obama care is a remedy for the state and such individuals under financial pressure. The law caters for those below the poverty level The tenets of the law ensure that all types of discrimination in health care coverage and provision are prevented. Accordingly, equal rights are safeguarded. In terms of insurance, sick people cannot be dropped from insurance cover. Therefore, individuals cannot be denied coverage for their preexisting conditions. In addition, women will not be charged higher rates as compared to men. Discriminatory practices are prevalent in women seeking insurance cover and treatment in hospitals. This is particularly evident in reproductive health. Women are also more likely than their male counterparts to proceed without necessary healthcare and treatment. Therefore, Obamacare’s full implementation in 2014 will eliminate these disparities. Many community healthcare centers are in deplorable conditions. These centers are also situated in areas where people live below the poverty line. Many wealthy Americans can afford private healthcare (Taylor). For the poor Americans, they have little or no option, but visit the community health center. These centers have some shortcomings such as; lack of adequate facilities in terms of medical and laboratory equipment, low doctor, nurse to patient ratio and relatively poor services. In additional, some of the facilities use outdated equipment and laboratory material. Obamacare seeks to alter the current status quo. Community heath centers under the law will be improved. Poor people will ultimately have access to efficient and effective treatment with improved facilities. As of 2007, up to 40 percent of insured Americans stated that their insurance cover did not adequately meet their requirements (Kaplan, et. al.). Insurance coverage that is affordable for many Americans would mean that they pay for what they can manage. Obamacare has the provision for insurance companies to compete for coverage under a system of insurance exchange pool. This will go a long way in decreasing insurance premiums for the majority of Americans. The total number of Americans that are between the 133% and 400% margin will be able to afford coverage. The lower the salary of an individual, the lower the percentage of income payment and the more help to be received. However, this system is deemed inefficient and ineffective in some sections of the American populace. The total share of insured Americans has been on a steady decline since the year 2000. In 2010, close to 84% of citizens in the US had some form of health coverage. Consequently, up to 49 million people had gone without health insurance for a significant period within that year. The pool of Americans under private insurance has shrunk. Majority of Americans are reliant on public insurance. Up to 31% of the total population is under public insurance programs. Obamacare therefore regulates these insurance programs (Keller). No one is forced to have insurance cover instead; people are urged to safeguard their health and that of their families. The insurance health exchange is set to go on sale in 2014 to offer a wide variety of protections and benefits. Over the past three years, tax credits have been distributed to Americans. The purpose of credits is to help people in healthcare payment. In addition, many middle class Americans will save a significant amount of money via tax cuts. The program is long term and more people are set to benefit. Waste from cuts reimbursements and Medicare to the private Medicare advantage plans are reduced under Obamacare. The $716 billion waste will be eliminated and finances are rescued for reinvestment in health care (Zax). Budget deficits have also increased in America for some time. Reduction in deficits is also an advantage of the law. However, some analysts and experts dispute that the law will lower budget deficits. These contradictions will become known with the complete implementation of the law. Obamacare is a suitable bill in restructuring the health care system and insurance, both important for America. However, the complications and issues it entails need to be addressed. Public awareness and education is instrumental in helping Americans understand the bill and demystify some of the myths it has solicited. Many people would like to see the law repealed. If this is done, majority of the American populace will devastated and lose the opportunity to have proper health coverage. If the statistics are anything to go by, insurance cover will ultimately be a luxury among citizens especially those from poor households. Insurance companies will also continue to deny proper health care coverage for preexisting conditions. These insurance companies are also controlled by wealthy individuals and companies whose ultimate goal is money and profit not appropriate health cover. Health care reform has been long overdue and Obamacare offers solutions to the problems in health provision. Work cited Crowley, Steven. â€Å"Health care reform and the Supreme Court (Affordable Care Act).† New York Times. 2 October 2012. Web. 18 November 2012. Kaplan, Robert and Michael Porter. â€Å"The big idea: How to solve the cost crisis in health care.† Harvard Business Review. September 2011. Web. 18 November 2012. Keller, Bill. â€Å"Five Obamacare Myths.† The New York Times. July 12 2012. Web. 18 November 2012. Taylor, Chris. â€Å"The health care reform that can’t be stopped.† Harvard Business Review. 18 April 2012. Web . 18 November 2012. Zax, J.S. â€Å"Paying for Obamacare.† Economist. 2011. Web. 18 November 2012.

Issues to consider when a neighborhood may be exposed to Hazardous Case Study - 1

Issues to consider when a neighborhood may be exposed to Hazardous Emissions - Case Study Example People are availing the best of its positive approaches like medical facilities, communications and traveling facilities that has improved the quality of life tremendously. But at the same time, several negative impacts have emerged which are affecting people and their surroundings to quite an extent. One of the main battles which are going on between people and nature is to restore mother earth from the destruction which is happening because of the rapid growth of population and energy shortage. To overcome the energy problem, several alternatives have been tried to fix the issue like Biomass which itself is not good for people and environment and it leads to the misbalancing of a natural equilibrium of earth. Testing and experiments is been done on daily basis and every day is a day of discovery. In regard to this assignment, I would like to discuss Phosphorus as a chemical used in different kinds of utilities like toothpaste, fireworks, pesticides, matches, explosives, detergent e tc. Elemental Phosphorus: One of the main elemental phosphorus which is made up of common allotrope of phosphorus is white phosphorus. It is highly reactive elements with air, water and with any other chemical and due to this reason this element is not freely found on earth. White Phosphorus is extremely flammable and is formed by four atoms which cause high ring strain and instability. It is self igniting and results in a luminous light when reacts with air and can produce thick smoke. It should be handled with high precautions as it can cause severe burns to the skin if contacted. It is a wax like substance with yellowish color or sometimes colorless and it smells like garlic and can produce thick smoke when ignites. Its flames are also hard to extinguish and can burn flesh to bone under its covering thick smoke. (Ref: Elemental Phosphorus by A.K Saxena , 1982) Human Exposure of White Phosphorus: Emission of white phosphorus is possible through a lot of conditions like while handl ing or transportation, accidental spillage, during production of arms and ammunition. It is estimated by EPA 1989 that during the production of white phosphorus, 0.58kg is emitted in air and while the military use for illuminating the air or for producing smoke, the density of smoke is 0.1mg/m3 and the concentration of white phosphorus in smoke was 21 ppb according to EPA 1991. The presence of white phosphorus in environment or air can be fatal as it is very poisonous. Any human exposure to White phosphorus can experience nausea, stomach ache and drowsiness. It is damaging for liver, kidneys or and it burns the flesh to bone if contacted with skin. (Reference: Potential for Human Exposure) Environmental Effects of Phosphorus: Industrial use of White Phosphorus in the production of ammunition, the excretion of wastewater containing a large amount of white phosphorus settles at the surface at the side. White phosphorus is not very reactive in water and but it accumulates in the organi sms which can be harmful for aquatic life. It stays in the soil for several days before it turns into less harmful substances but in deep soil it can stay for thousands of years and that is one of the main reason for desalination and

Nike Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Nike - Research Paper Example This helped the firm a lot because it enabled the company the ability to raise money for future expansion. In 1985 Nike made its best decision ever by signing rookie basketball star, Michael Jordan, to a sponsorship contract. Jordan was given signature shoes which became extremely popular among the youth. The success of the Air Jordan shoes made Nike the industry leader. Innovations such as the external air bags made Nike products unique from the competition. Nike used superior marketing campaigns to showcase its products. It’s slogan â€Å"Just do it† was created in 1988. A year later Nike signed another popular athlete, Bo Jackson, which helped the company increased its market share in the cross training product segment. In 1996 Nike signed another incredible athlete to become a sponsor in gulf superstar Tiger Woods. Today Nike has become the world’s leading innovator in footwear, apparel, equipment, and accessories (Nikeinc). In fiscal year 2013 Nike Corporation generated total revenues of $25.13 billion and a net income of $2.48 billion. The firm is very well managed led by its CEO and President Mark Parker. Phillip H. Knight is the Chairman of the board of directors. The company has many popular brands including Converse, Hurley International, Jordan brand, and Nike Gulf. Its branding strategy has helped the company obtain a tremendous customer retention rate. Based on Pareto’s 80/20 rule 80% of a company’s sales come from 20% of its customers. In the late 1990’s Nike was involved in a sweatshop scandal that hurt its reputation and depleted its sales by 50% a year after the revelation of the scandal, but since then the firm has cleaned up its act to become one of the most socially responsible companies in the world. â€Å"The Nike Foundation works to unleash the unique potential of adolescent girls to end poverty for themselves and for the world† (Nikeinc). Nike believes in the value of cultural diversity. It has several

Power IT's Acquisition Strategy - the 3rd-Party Modified Off-The-Shelf Assignment

Power IT's Acquisition Strategy - the 3rd-Party Modified Off-The-Shelf Solution - Assignment Example As per the Power IT’s acquisition strategy of purchasing an enterprise resource planning solution from a third-party vendor, the company’s finance director and chief executive officer were of the view that the software development expertise of the third-party modified off-the-shelf solution would be â€Å"high†, being off-the-shelf and having the capability of modification as per local requirements, as PowerIT wanted such a software solution that could be adjusted to local company needs. Only 3rd party modified off-the-shelf solution acquisition strategy was fitting the bill because the ERP solution could be modified according to the emerging needs of the end-users. If the company wanted to internally develop the software, it was not sure of its internal IT team’s expertise in the application domain, as shown in figure 2, â€Å"variable†. Domain knowledge should be very strong for developing software in-house on such a large scale, which was not in the capacity of PowerIT’s internal team. According to the case writers, local company knowledge of 3rd party modified off-the-shelf solution is relatively low because it is not internally developed; only an internally developed solution by PowerIT can have high knowledge of it. That’s why a 3rd party developed solution is ranked â€Å"low† on local company knowledge by the case writers in the area of its relative strength. The selection process was faulty. When the three short-listed vendors were asked to give their presentations on their systems’ support to the company’s IT needs, one vendor did not turn up to give a presentation, and the other gave a generic presentation while the third vendor discussed the PowerIT environment and the suitability of their product. Although not the least satisfied with any of the vendors for their presentations, the contract was given to the third vendor. The acquisition process should have been given a review or stopped due to not meeting the right vendor. Such an alarming drawback was not even shared by the BDM with the CEO and senior managers. Instead of inviting new tenders or asking the short-listed vendors to provide a detailed demonstration or not awarding the contract, the contract was awarded to the third vendor. The project was selected both by the chief operating officer and finance director.     

Problems of excessive meat consumption

Problems of excessive meat consumption PROBLEM Nowadays, meat consumption is becoming an uncontrollable problem. As a result of high consumption, different kinds of issues occurred. It is possible to sum these issues up in two major groups as health and environment. Red meat consumption linked to increase risk of total, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality. Meat consumption also increases the risk of diabetes. According to new research from Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH) when people eat more meat than usual, their risk of getting diabetes will be increased by 50 percent. In fact, same study shows that people who decreased their meat consumption lowered their diabetes risk will increase 14 percent. On the other side environmental problems are also vital. For instance, it ought to be 60 pounds of water to produce one pound of potatoes while 2,500 pounds of water for a pound of beef. Health Issues: Cancer There are a lot of studies about the relationship between diet and Cancer. According to the searches in England and Germany, the meat consumers are 40 percent more likely to have Cancer than the vegetarians. Again Harvard studies show that people who eat meat everyday have almost three times the colon cancer risk, compared to other people. There are many reasons for this result. During the cooking meat, some mutagenic compounds are produced like HCAs and they are very dangerous for our health. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons are another reason for Cancer. Especially broiling and grilling meat produce these kind hydrocarbons (Meat Consumption and Cancer Risk). So, these chemicals penetrate our body via meat. Breast Cancer: The fat comes from animal products, such as meat and dairy products increases the rate of breast cancer. For women who can eat meat daily has an 8.5 times higher risk of this cancer than poorer women who can eat make once a month (Hirayama, 1978). Colorectal Cancer: Red meat is a great factor for colon cancer. According to another Harvard research, consuming beef, pork or lamb have approximately three times the risk compared to people that avoid these meats (Meat Consumption and Cancer Risk). Mainly, colorectal cancer is another effect of meat consumption. Prostate Cancer: As with breast cancer, if a man takes dietary fat, especially from animal products, increases his testosterone product and this causes increasing of prostate cancer risk. There are two large studies at Harvard University about this issue. According to one of them, the men who eat red meat everyday have 2.5 times risk compared to the men who eat it once a week (Giovannucci, et al., 1993). Put simply, meat consumption also causes prostate cancer. Other Cancers: In addition to these cancers, there are several researches about kidney, pancreatic and other kinds of cancer. Commonly, similar reasons such as much meat consumption and much intake of fat increase cancer risk. Otherwise, the same sources claim that vegetarian diets protect us against the cancer (Meat Consumption and Cancer Risk). Thus people have to avoid meat consumption. Heart Disease Vegetarian people’s intake of calories and fat is lower than non-vegatarians do. Thus, they have lower risk of heart disease. Regular consumption of red meat especially processed ones, increase mortality risk directly (Mayo Clinic, 2011). Meat consumption clearly causes deaths. Indirect Factors People who consumed high levels of red meat have less-than-healthy body weights. Meat consumption makes them also want to smoke and drink (Sarich, 2013). All these factors are another way to die younger. Environment Issues: Meat consumption has a big impact on the environment. It is considered as the most important reason for the Global Warming. Animal farming is the major source of carbon dioxide. Unfortunately there is no such a thing as sustainable, humane meat production. Changing the source of your meat and preferring farms which seem to be care about ecology do not change the facts. Any farm cannot change the effect of farm animals. The combined emissions of animals are more than all transportation systems. Lindsay Wilson compares the carbon footprints of five different American diets in her article titled ‘The Carbon Footprint of 5 Diets Compared’. As stated in the article, studies allocate diets in five different ways: Meat Lover Diet, Average Person Diet, No Beef Diet, Vegetarian Diet and Vegan diet. It is an important factor that the studies only attach importance to the emissions rates. They do not include storage, transportation emissions. http://shrinkthatfootprint.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Plates.gif According to the article, ‘A vegetarian’s footprint is about two thirds of the average American and almost half that of a meat lover’. We can see that there is a huge difference between the vegetarian and meat lover life style in terms of carbon food print. On the other hand vegan diet leads the ecological nutrition as usual. The health secretary of U.K, Andy Burnham said that ‘Climate change can seem a distant, impersonal threat; in fact the associated costs to health are a very real and present danger’. He emphasizes that everyone should cut back on the amount of meat and meat products they eat. Even going meatless once a week (Meatless Mondays) has a big positive impact on the environment. Another ecological issue is the water consumption. According to the United Nations’ Food and Agricultural Organization’s report titled Livestock’s Long Shadow (2006) by the year 2050, 2/3 of the World population will lack clean water even for their basic needs. There is a hidden water use behind meat production. It takes 60 pounds of water to produce one pound of potatoes. On the other hand, it takes more than 20,000 pounds of water to produce a pound of beef. According to PETA, all but half of the water used in the U.S, used to raise the animals for food. We would save more water if we do not eat a pound of beef than we do by not showering for six months they say! As a result, in any case it is beneficial for us to cut back meat. Every small step is important. Graham Hill, the founder of TreeHugger.com states the importance of small steps in his Ted talk titled ‘Why I’m a weekday vegetarian’. At the end of his speech there is a very unique expression which give hope to us: ‘’If all of us ate half as much meat, it would be like half of us were vegetarians’’. SOLUTIONS At the present time, high numbers of projects have been developing about meat consumption in USA. Such as Meatless Monday, Eating Better, Tax Meat and Earth Friendly Diet Campaign. These projects are supported by society organizations, government and celebrities. Projects which are considerable are listed below: Meatless Monday: It is a project which encourages people not to eat meat on Mondays. The aim of this project is to improve peoples health. The project was founded by Sid Lerner in 2003. It is an association withJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. The reason that they choose Monday is that people are not exactly living healthy during weekends, so not eating meat on Mondays would help them to get back to their usual eating habits. Monday also represents a fresh start. In order to give a support to this project some celebrities are going meatless on Mondays. Such as; Sir Richard Branson (founder of Virgin Group), Denise Richards (actress), Jessica Simpson (actress, singer), Oprah (TV star), Kate Moss (model). Eat Better (Live Better): This movement believes that living better starts with eating better. In order to eat better, you need to be informed about food according to them. They share recipes varying on different needs as vegetarians, Low Carb, Sodium and Gluten free diets. Tax Meat: This movement Tax Meat is started by PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals). They are trying to convince the government to put tax on meat because of two reasons. One of them is animal products contain remarkable amounts of cholesterol and it is unhealthy to consume by people. Secondly, studies show that there is a connection between cancer and the consumption of meat. Take Extinction off Your Plate (Earth Friendly Diet Campaign): Take Extinction off Your Plate aims to save the wildlife by helping to decrease the amount of meat consumption across the country. It was launched in 2014 in Tucson, AZ. They started a campaign called Earth Friendly Diet. It basically supports being a vegan and it is trying to attract people into being a vegan. They claim thatâ€Å"By cutting just one-third of the meat from our diets, we can each save as much as 340,667 gallons of water, more than 4,000 square feet of land, and the greenhouse gas equivalent of driving 2,700 fewer miles a year.† EVALUATION Meat Consumption is one of the oldest habits of human life. Therefore cutting or even decreasing meat consumption is a huge mountain to climb. To convince people not to eat meat, it needs to be put forward certain reasons. Since it is about convincing; taxing the meat or in another words forbidding meat in a way, is not a steady solution. Wealthy part of the society won’t be coaction by taxing while the other part will. So this situation can easily cause social problems. For this reason Tax Meat project maybe a little part of the solution but definitely cannot be the best. Take Extinction off Your Plate is a kind of limited movement. The project intends to make people vegan. Given this evidence it may sound that it is an agreeable idea but in real it is not. Forwhy to want people be a vegan is leaving an alarming impression. In simple the cure is worse than the disease. When people heard that offer they may remain at bay. Eat Better Live Better project seems not to be adequate. Although it has some actionary parts, turnout of the project is just advisory, it is not satisfying, not like Meatless Monday. The project of Meatless Monday has a certain message. Those who partaken know what to do, why they are doing it and beyond that it is very easy to do, they don’t eat meat Mondays. Most of the people accept Monday as an opportunity for a fresh start to a new week. Meatless Monday followers are increasing each passing day. It is easier to start a plant-based lifestyle via not eating meat once a week. It will be much easier for willing people to become a weekday vegetarian first, which can be followed by a whole vegetarianism. This simple idea achieves a considerable amount of benefits. Works Cited Giovannucci, E., Rimm, E. B., Colditz, G. A., Stampfer, M. J., Ascherio, A., Chut, C. C., Willett, W. C. (1993). A prospective study of dietary fat and risk of prostate cancer. Journal of The National Cancer Institute, 1571-1579. Hirayama, T. (1978). Epidemiology of breast cancer with special reference to the role of diet. Preventive Medicine, 173-195. Mayo Clinic. (2011, September 16). Meatless meals: The benefits of eating less meat. Retrieved from The Website of Mayo Clinic: http://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-living/nutrition-and-healthy-eating/in-depth/meatless-meals/art-20048193 Meat Consumption and Cancer Risk. (n.d.). Retrieved from Physicians Committe for Responsible Medicine: http://www.pcrm.org/health/cancer-resources/diet-cancer/facts/meat-consumption-and-cancer-risk Sarich, C. (2013, July 21). Harvard Says Reducing Red Meat Consumption can Extend Life by 20%. Retrieved from Natural Society: http://naturalsociety.com/reducing-red-meat-consumption-extend-life-20-percent/#ixzz2zdnAhdzY

An Account of Racial Inequality in Langston Hughes Freedom Train :: Hughes Freedom Train Essays

An Account of Racial Inequality in Langston Hughes' Freedom Train "Freedom Train" by Langston Hughes is a powerful and eye-opening account of racial inequality in the early Twentieth century. Hughes poem is filled with a sense of irony but also hope towards the future. This tongue-in-cheek look at the so-called "Freedom" Train is a powerful image. Langston Hughes included important ideas in a simple and original way. Hughes was writing at the height of the Harlem Renaissance and his focus remained on issues faced by African Americans, but he did not dwell on the injustices. "Freedom Train" and other writings of Langston Hughes had a very hopeful tone. The poem, written in 1947, was produced in a time surrounded by war, patriotism, and also racism in America. World War II was ending and patriotism was at a high. The title, "Freedom Train" was coined from a locomotive that carried the Constitution, Declaration of Independence, and other important American documents on a tour across the United States. People were free to visit this train when it arrived in their town. This was one example of growing patriotism after World War II. The irony of this poem is, as Hughes points out, the fact that the American people were celebrating this Freedom Train and documents assuring our freedom, while African Americans were still not even considered equal citizens by most white Americans. Racism was still common and blacks were still treated as inferiors. These injustices are what Hughes is concerned with. Hughes cannot fathom this as the "Freedom" Train because he has no real sense of freedom, but he is hopeful and looks to the future. Hugh asks, "How can this be a Freedom Train?" He remarks that he cannot even sit in the white man's railroad car that, at the same time, is encouraging freedom. The irony is unbelievable. Hughes is, in a sense, waiting for his own freedom train in a much deeper sense. By taking this poem one section at a time, and looking at the historical significance, one discovers these important links and u nderlying messages conveyed by Langston Hughes. Langston Hughes gives us an African American view on many issues that were important during this time. He writes in a very sarcastic manner when speaking of the Freedom Train.